How Does the Security access_control Work?

For each incoming request, Symfony checks each access_control entry to find one that matches the current request. As soon as it finds a matching access_control entry, it stops - only the first matching access_control is used to enforce access.

Each access_control has several options that configure two different things:

  1. should the incoming request match this access control entry
  2. once it matches, should some sort of access restriction be enforced:

1. Matching Options

Symfony creates an instance of RequestMatcher for each access_control entry, which determines whether or not a given access control should be used on this request. The following access_control options are used for matching:

  • path
  • ip or ips
  • host
  • methods

Take the following access_control entries as an example:

  • YAML
    # app/config/security.yml
    security:
        # ...
        access_control:
            - { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_USER_IP, ip: 127.0.0.1 }
            - { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_USER_HOST, host: symfony\.com$ }
            - { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_USER_METHOD, methods: [POST, PUT] }
            - { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_USER }
    
  • XML
    <!-- app/config/security.xml -->
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <srv:container xmlns="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/security"
        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
        xmlns:srv="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services"
        xsi:schemaLocation="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services
            http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd">
    
        <config>
            <!-- ... -->
            <access-control>
                <rule path="^/admin" role="ROLE_USER_IP" ip="127.0.0.1" />
                <rule path="^/admin" role="ROLE_USER_HOST" host="symfony\.com$" />
                <rule path="^/admin" role="ROLE_USER_METHOD" method="POST, PUT" />
                <rule path="^/admin" role="ROLE_USER" />
            </access-control>
        </config>
    </srv:container>
    
  • PHP
    // app/config/security.php
    $container->loadFromExtension('security', array(
        // ...
        'access_control' => array(
            array(
                'path' => '^/admin',
                'role' => 'ROLE_USER_IP',
                'ip' => '127.0.0.1',
            ),
            array(
                'path' => '^/admin',
                'role' => 'ROLE_USER_HOST',
                'host' => 'symfony\.com$',
            ),
            array(
                'path' => '^/admin',
                'role' => 'ROLE_USER_METHOD',
                'method' => 'POST, PUT',
            ),
            array(
                'path' => '^/admin',
                'role' => 'ROLE_USER',
            ),
        ),
    ));
    

For each incoming request, Symfony will decide which access_control to use based on the URI, the client’s IP address, the incoming host name, and the request method. Remember, the first rule that matches is used, and if ip, host or method are not specified for an entry, that access_control will match any ip, host or method:

URI IP HOST METHOD access_control Why?
/admin/user 127.0.0.1 example.com GET rule #1 (ROLE_USER_IP) The URI matches path and the IP matches ip.
/admin/user 127.0.0.1 symfony.com GET rule #1 (ROLE_USER_IP) The path and ip still match. This would also match the ROLE_USER_HOST entry, but only the first access_control match is used.
/admin/user 168.0.0.1 symfony.com GET rule #2 (ROLE_USER_HOST) The ip doesn’t match the first rule, so the second rule (which matches) is used.
/admin/user 168.0.0.1 symfony.com POST rule #2 (ROLE_USER_HOST) The second rule still matches. This would also match the third rule (ROLE_USER_METHOD), but only the first matched access_control is used.
/admin/user 168.0.0.1 example.com POST rule #3 (ROLE_USER_METHOD) The ip and host don’t match the first two entries, but the third - ROLE_USER_METHOD - matches and is used.
/admin/user 168.0.0.1 example.com GET rule #4 (ROLE_USER) The ip, host and method prevent the first three entries from matching. But since the URI matches the path pattern of the ROLE_USER entry, it is used.
/foo 127.0.0.1 symfony.com POST matches no entries This doesn’t match any access_control rules, since its URI doesn’t match any of the path values.

2. Access Enforcement

Once Symfony has decided which access_control entry matches (if any), it then enforces access restrictions based on the roles and requires_channel options:

  • role If the user does not have the given role(s), then access is denied (internally, an AccessDeniedException is thrown);
  • requires_channel If the incoming request’s channel (e.g. http) does not match this value (e.g. https), the user will be redirected (e.g. redirected from http to https, or vice versa).

小技巧

If access is denied, the system will try to authenticate the user if not already (e.g. redirect the user to the login page). If the user is already logged in, the 403 “access denied” error page will be shown. See How to Customize Error Pages for more information.

Matching access_control By IP

Certain situations may arise when you need to have an access_control entry that only matches requests coming from some IP address or range. For example, this could be used to deny access to a URL pattern to all requests except those from a trusted, internal server.

警告

As you’ll read in the explanation below the example, the ips option does not restrict to a specific IP address. Instead, using the ips key means that the access_control entry will only match this IP address, and users accessing it from a different IP address will continue down the access_control list.

Here is an example of how you configure some example /internal* URL pattern so that it is only accessible by requests from the local server itself:

  • YAML
    # app/config/security.yml
    security:
        # ...
        access_control:
            #
            - { path: ^/internal, roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY, ips: [127.0.0.1, ::1] }
            - { path: ^/internal, roles: ROLE_NO_ACCESS }
    
  • XML
    <!-- app/config/security.xml -->
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <srv:container xmlns="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/security"
        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
        xmlns:srv="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services"
        xsi:schemaLocation="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services
            http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd">
    
        <config>
            <!-- ... -->
            <access-control>
                <rule path="^/esi" role="IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY"
                    ips="127.0.0.1, ::1" />
                <rule path="^/esi" role="ROLE_NO_ACCESS" />
            </access-control>
        </config>
    </srv:container>
    
  • PHP
    // app/config/security.php
    $container->loadFromExtension('security', array(
        // ...
        'access_control' => array(
            array(
                'path' => '^/esi',
                'role' => 'IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY',
                'ips' => '127.0.0.1, ::1'
            ),
            array(
                'path' => '^/esi',
                'role' => 'ROLE_NO_ACCESS'
            ),
        ),
    ));
    

Here is how it works when the path is /internal/something coming from the external IP address 10.0.0.1:

  • The first access control rule is ignored as the path matches but the IP address does not match either of the IPs listed;
  • The second access control rule is enabled (the only restriction being the path) and so it matches. If you make sure that no users ever have ROLE_NO_ACCESS, then access is denied (ROLE_NO_ACCESS can be anything that does not match an existing role, it just serves as a trick to always deny access).

But if the same request comes from 127.0.0.1 or ::1 (the IPv6 loopback address):

  • Now, the first access control rule is enabled as both the path and the ip match: access is allowed as the user always has the IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY role.
  • The second access rule is not examined as the first rule matched.

Forcing a Channel (http, https)

You can also require a user to access a URL via SSL; just use the requires_channel argument in any access_control entries. If this access_control is matched and the request is using the http channel, the user will be redirected to https:

  • YAML
    # app/config/security.yml
    security:
        # ...
        access_control:
            - { path: ^/cart/checkout, roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY, requires_channel: https }
    
  • XML
    <!-- app/config/security.xml -->
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <srv:container xmlns="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/security"
        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
        xmlns:srv="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services"
        xsi:schemaLocation="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services
            http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd">
    
        <access-control>
            <rule path="^/cart/checkout"
                role="IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY"
                requires-channel="https" />
        </access-control>
    </srv:container>
    
  • PHP
    // app/config/security.php
    $container->loadFromExtension('security', array(
        'access_control' => array(
            array(
                'path' => '^/cart/checkout',
                'role' => 'IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY',
                'requires_channel' => 'https',
            ),
        ),
    ));